He does not have to be an "ally" and can choose his allegiances in the best way that suits him. If a person is shamed and defamed as "privileged" or an "abuser", then why not celebrate having privilege and the power to abuse? If you are called a "predator" is it not better to be that than the prey?
The whole idea of justifying your existence by moral obligations to other people is an utter absurdity, and the realization of this creates a serious threat to the current worldview.
The reason the arbiters of our political system love to push progressivism (or the illusion of it) is not because they care about advancing the "rights" of any group but to control the masses so the exceptional and strong will not overtake the power structure and restore the natural order.
They also have to create hysteria and moral panics to keep everyone distracted. A perfect example is the Epstein case-The elites can live like Roman Emperors while simultaneously chastising everyone else with compulsory moralities. They will throw their own under the bus to keep the rabble in line and say they are protecting the "victimized" .
The goal is to keep everyone in a state of fear, guilt, and shame- you have to care about what they tell you to "care" about. Otherwise you're a "bad person".
Everything is also a mixed signal and a dialectic- Ex."Make money, make money!" but "Capitalism is bad!" and Sexual imagery is constantly thrown in our faces but licentious behavior especially on the part of men, is punished. Life has become a giant slutwalk in the name of "female empowerment" and any normal male reaction to it is put down or used for female ego validation or towards the capitalist "exploitation" of female sexuality and promotion of pornography which so many "feminists" and hypocritical social conservatives rail against.
A cancelled man will see through this control mechanism and recognize that the acquisition of wealth and sex is the natural drive of life and the will to power.
There should be no "mixed signals" in the way!
We should also note that our rich and famous function as kind of demigods and the mouthpieces of their handlers. They exist in the public eye so their drama, foibles, and iconography can fill the religious needs of the masses in a secularized society. They rise and fall as function demands it. They preach "democracy" while enjoying the benefits of being in a higher caste.
I have no doubt that the most of the elite classes view the great mass of people with utter disdain and contempt whether they would openly admit to it or not. In many ways it is only natural for them to do so.
Meanwhile as mentioned before about dialectics-the masses are trained to both worship celebrities, the rich, and famous but to also despise them. To live vicariously through them but to celebrate in their downfalls.
Everyone wants to be rich and famous but blames the rich and famous for their plights. Everything is the "fault" of the Billionaires yet we continuously use the products, services, and technology created by those Billionaires . We decry wealth inequality, and the oppression of the populace by large corporations yet no one ever stages a viable revolt.
The go to solution is always to "vote" if we just elect the "right people". But this never works because the nature of the system is to preserve the power structure. Self interest will always trump the "will of the people". And the real will of the people is to have a parental authority to "keep things running" no matter how neglectful, abusive, or inept it is.
Thus the cancelled man will have to recognize trying to even decode or change the system is utterly pointless.
The upshot here is that being an outlier, he can view the system as in complete decay and that the true nature of things will be revealed.
Out of the dissolution I believe we can expect the return of nature, and of a true metaphysical order which will favor the exceptional and the strong.
This is my consolation....
